Friday, August 28, 2009

Two stories

Cancer is a terrible thing. There isn’t anyone in this world, it seems, that cancer hasn’t touched in some way. I haven’t been online much recently because of the story below and other things that seem to be tearing me away, so I’m sorry I haven’t posted more often. Here are two stories:

Those of you who have been following my blog have seen my posts about my granny. She is still hanging on, but I know that soon she won’t be with us anymore. And yet, she fights on. In Facebook posts last night and today, my aunt said this:

"Came home to shower and give dog meds, then back to moms radiation appt. One shot to the leg, then that is all we can do, it is up to hospice to handle the pain from now on. They got her an air mattress, (thanks Kelli for the advice) it is doing a good job for her. Also got her a new doctor, one who will call back, she is sleeping a lot now, just needs a hand to hold. Gotta run will update when I get here to do so…."

"Mom did not understand the trip to the doc today, but trusts us. She still wants to find us there if she wakes and we will be there. Come visit with her if you can, she is still funny as hell when she is awake, she just sleeps a lot more now. I thought we were going to lose her yesterday, maybe she was just testing us. This time with her is hard, but I am glad I am getting to spend it with her."


Here are a couple of pictures of happier times, at her 90th birthday celebration this past spring:



Beautiful lady


Granny still has a sense of humor

I received the following story from a friend. It’s a true story that actually happened back in 2005. It is very touching and seemed appropriate to share now.

On Valentine's Day 2002, Katie Kirkpatrick, then a freshman at Rochester College, (a small Christian college in Rochester, Michigan) was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor. Undaunted, Katie strove to keep up with her studies, but she suffered another setback in 2003 when she was diagnosed with "an inoperable lung tumor wrapped around her pulmonary artery." Nonetheless, in 2004 the resilient Katie took part in champion cyclist Lance Armstrong's "Ride for Roses" fundraiser.

On 15 January, 2005, 21-year-old Katie - the girl "with a contagious smile and unrelenting optimism" who had been battling cancer for three years - married Lapeer County sherriff's deputy Nick Godwin, her high school sweetheart and the love of her life, at Church of Christ in Hazel Park, Michigan. Katie Kirkpatrick Godwin passed away at the McLaren Regional Medical Center in Flint, Michigan, on 20 January 2005, just five days after her wedding. Her husband, Nick, said of the wedding and Katie's passing: "It was wonderful. It was a dream come true. She was the most beautiful angel ever - just caring and selfless, and such an inspiration to everyone. She was always smiling no matter what happened, no matter what news she got. She was as close as perfect as they come."



Her name is Katie Kirkpatrick , 21 yrs old. Next to her is her fiancé, Nick , 23. This picture was taken prior to their wedding January 11th, 2005. Katie has terminal cancer and spends hours in chemotherapy. Here Nick awaits while she finishes one of the sessions.


Even in pain and dealing with her organs shutting down, with the help of morphine, Katie took care of every single part of the wedding planning. Her dress had to be adjusted several times due to Katie 's constant weight loss.


An expected guest was her oxygen tank. Katie had to use it during the ceremony and reception. The other couple in this picture is Nick 's parents, very emotional with the wedding and of course to see their son marrying the girl he fell in love when he was an adolescent.


Katie , in a wheel chair listening to her husband and friends singing to her.


In the middle of the party, Katie had to rest for a bit and catch her breath. The pain does not allow her to stand for long period of time.


Katie died 5 days after her wedding. To see a fragile woman dress as bride with a beautiful smile makes you think... happiness is always there within reach, no matter how long it lasts.....lets enjoy life and don't live a complicated life. Life is too short.


Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Cue the music!

CAUTION: Big Irony Alert Ahead!!

Tonight on Fox, Bill O'Reilly was talking to someone about the Obama administration and "diversionary tactics." The military has nothing on Obama when it comes to diversions. It has not gone unnoticed that every time something doesn't go the way this administration wants it to, suddenly we have some big news story or crisis that diverts attention from the original issue. Boy, they really have the liberal media in their pocket, don't they? The media just follows them around like puppies, lapping it all up. Right now, Obama is trying to divert us away from health care reform and the spiraling deficit.

When I watch the news every night, I go back in forth in my head. First, I hear the music from the movie "Chicago" (how appropriate is THAT), the song titled "Razzle Dazzle." Remember that scene? Obama is Billy Flynn, the smooth talking, charming, Chicago lawyer (more irony there). He explains to his client Roxie Hart (that would be his administration) that it's all a circus show, an illusion. All he has to do is "Razzle Dazzle them" and they will believe anything. Obama is razzle dazzling the country right now, or at least trying to. Here is the entire scene from the movie:



The other thing that rolls around in my head is the scene from "The Wizard of Oz" where Dorothy clicks her heels. If I click my heels, do you think I'll wake up and everything will be right with the world?


Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 24, 2009

O Beautiful, America

The last few days have been tough. I've had a hard time coming up with material I felt was worthy commenting on. With a keen awareness of what is happening to our country, I have become very sensitive to all the negative press I've been seeing. At a point, you just need to shut down for a bit.

In history, there are lessons learned. Thomas Paine said, "Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Maybe that's what I have been feeling. That is why you haven't heard from me in a few days, but I'm back now.

While surfing the net looking for something I could share with everyone, Stuart Shepard provided this wonderful, albeit short, video. Evidently, Stuart had the same sentiment I did and felt a need to step back for a bit and remember what it is we are all working so hard to try and preserve. Please enjoy this video and remember how wonderful our country is, and how hard others in the past have fought to preserve our liberties and way of life. May this generation live up to the challenge.




Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Obama using "Spiritual Language" to push health care reform

This healthcare reform bill has something for everyone and there is an equal opportunity hatred for this bill, depending on who you are and what is most important to you. Maybe you're a senior concerned about some of the end of life provisions. Maybe you're a veteran concerned about VA benefits. Maybe you're a parent concerned about home invasions and someone telling you how to raise your children. But one of the most frightening parts of this bill deals with abortion.

Many women have walked down this path. I myself struggled with this in my youth. I was faced with a pregnancy at a difficult time in my life and wondered if I should just "end it," with "it" being the pregnancy and not thinking about the child. I chose not to go through with an abortion and am grateful now that I made that choice. Sarah Palin herself, nervous about an uncertain future, ultimately made the right decision. She has such a beautiful family and they all have such a love for Trig. She is such a wonderful example of how fear can be turned into good and purpose.

A people who willingly choose to end a human life, and a government who chooses to fund it, are morally and ethically wrong. This hits at the very foundation of who we are as a nation. Does a soldier on the battlefield want to take a life? He will if he has to in order to defend his country, but it is never his first choice and always his last. And yet, our government wants to not only give this choice, but fund it as well.

It is no secret that this is a charged issue. Those who typically are the most passionate about this are those of faith. The word of God says all life is sacred, and again, an unborn child is a life. It is not a choice, it is not tissue, it is a life. So when I listened to Obama in the video below, the word "chameleon" came to mind. A chameleon is defined as "a changeable, fickle, or inconsistent person." Now, that would seem to fit our president to a "T", wouldn't you say? And in this current debate, there seems to be no limit to Obama's ability, or willingness, to say whatever it takes to get the healthcare reform bill passed. The latest insult to our intelligence has Obama speaking to a group of spiritual leaders, using "enlightened" words in order to persuade them into supporting this legislation, including abortion. I am not pleased that our President, whose spiritual background is unclear, invokes spiritual phraseology to suit his mood, the climate, or who he is speaking to. He will say and do whatever it takes to get this bill passed! Please watch this video.



"Abortion is not excluded and that means that, based on past history with congress, it will be included." I work for an attorney. Something that is not excluded is presumed to be allowed. If this legislation is allowed to move forward, our tax dollars will be paying to end lives, in more ways than I can count. Add that to the Sarah Palin's "death panel" debate.


Bookmark and Share


Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Alaskan Daily Digest - Whole lot of shakin' goin' on

So, I'm at work today, sitting at my desk in my office chair on casters, rolling from one side of my desk to the other, just like I do every morning. But this morning, when I got to the other side of the desk and stopped the chair, I was still moving! Yes - we were having another earthquake. Another woman in my office said "oooooooooooo I think we're having an earthquake" as she looked out the window and sat very still. Earthquakes in Alaska are very common, and I was somewhat aware of this when I moved here, but was introduced to them right away once I landed in my new home state.

When my kids, my father and I flew to Alaska to move me here permanently, there was still snow on the ground and I was in awe of Alaska's beauty. But at first there was no time to go sight-seeing. My furniture was at least 2 weeks behind me and we had packed air mattresses into our luggage so that we would have something to sleep on the first few days. Purchasing mattresses was a high priority, so on day 3, we were off to the local furniture store to check them out.

This store was a warehouse of sorts and had the fluorescent drop ceiling lights hanging from chains. The kids and I were looking at mattresses when suddenly it felt as if the floor had dropped 2 feet! It was like being in an elevator going down and having it suddenly stop. I looked at the clerk, a young girl about the same age as my college freshman daughter, and she said "I think we just had an earthquake!" My response was, "Ya think!" Ok, so the sarcasm does come out every once in a while (defense mechanism I suppose!).

In the years that have followed, I have felt many earthquakes. Alaska has roughly 50 earthquakes a day, all over the state. Most of them are so slight or so remote that no one feels them. But every once in a while we get reminded that we live in the "ring of fire" (and yes, we have volcanoes in case ya didn't know!). The way these earthquakes "feel" can be described in one of two ways:
1) The jolt described above, or
2) A long rolling feeling, a lot like that moving sidewalk that Sandy walked on in that funhouse in the final scene of the movie "Grease."

Today's earthquake was the rolling type and the feeling of it trailed for nearly a minute, which is a long time when you're sitting there, trying to figure out if you should run for a doorway or act all cool like it doesn't bother you.

Here is Anchorage Daily News' article on the event:

Earthquake rattles Southcentral

Daily News staff and wire reports

Published: August 19th, 2009 10:34 AM
Last Modified: August 19th, 2009 07:49 PM

A magnitude 5.0 earthquake under Cook Inlet rattled buildings in Anchorage and elsewhere in Southcentral Alaska this morning. There were no reports of damage.

The quake, at 10:19 a.m., was centered under Cook Inlet, 36 miles west of Anchorage, and 18 miles northeast of the village of Tyonek and 13 miles northeast of Beluga, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.

It occurred at a depth of about 38 miles.

The reported magnitude of the quake has been adjusted repeatedly since it occurred. The Alaska Earthquake Information Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks reported 4.97; the USGS rounded it to 5.0.

The West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center says the quake did not generate a tsunami.

Janelle Baker, administrative assistant and human resources manager for the Tyonek Native Corp., told The Associated Press there was no damage in her village of 154 on the northwest shore of Cook Inlet, 43 miles southwest of Anchorage.

"It was scary, especially being in the office," she said. "It was a pretty big jolt."

A dispatcher with the Anchorage Fire Department said the department had not received any calls about the earthquake, but firefighters at one station pulled trucks out of the garage because the building was shaking so much.

It appears most Alaskans took the quake in stride. Alaska State Troopers spokeswoman Megan Peters said there were no immediate calls about the earthquake.

"I was sitting at my computer, and I said, 'Did you guys feel that?' " she told the AP.

When they said they didn't, Peters said: "I'm pretty sure that was an earthquake. My whole office shook."

Alaska is seismically active and has frequent earthquakes, although most are too small or too remote to be felt.


The strongest earthquake ever recorded in North America, a 9.2 on the Richter scale, occurred on March 27, 1964 at 5:36 p.m., Good Friday. The Good Friday earthquake caused major destruction in the City of Anchorage and created a tsunami that destroyed the town of Valdez, which was later moved 5 miles down the coast to a safer location because there was nothing left. Please check out the link above for more information and pictures from this event.

For a real time look at earthquake activity in Alaska right now, check out the Alaska Earthquake Information Center.

And our Alaskan Daily Digest factoid of the day from the “Alaska Almanac: Facts About Alaska” :

"Experienced winter seal hunters wisely take SPAM on the polar ice pack because SPAM doesn't freeze!"



Bookmark and Share

Sarah Palin and something she knows best - Oil

A couple of days ago, I posted an entry about the Transalaska Pipeline as part of my Alaskan Daily Digest. What prompted that post was an email that day about ACES (Alaska's Clear and Equitable Share) which is the oil and gas tax production reform that Sarah Palin championed while in office. In the article was this statement:

"In an April 23 analyst presentation, ConocoPhillips’ top executives in Houston made a point of acknowledging Alaska production tax credits as being a significant component in the company’s profit."


This is important to Alaskans because we hold a share in the monies derived from oil production in our state. That is the reason that each Alaskan resident receives money from the Permanent Fund Dividend, and we are in much better shape financially than many other states in the US. We own a share in our resources.

Last night, Sarah Palin made a statement regarding our current administration's plan to send two billion dollars of our tax money to Brazil so they can drill off shore. Please read her statement:

YOUR TAX DOLLARS HARD AT WORK: FIRST CARS, NOW FOREIGN OIL

Today's Wall Street Journal contains some puzzling news for all Americans who are impacted by high energy prices and who share the goal of moving us toward energy independence.

For years, states rich with an abundance of oil and natural gas have been begging Washington, DC politicians for the right to develop their own natural resources on federal lands and off shore. Such development would mean good paying jobs here in the United States (with health benefits) and the resulting royalties and taxes would provide money for federal coffers that would potentially off-set the need for higher income taxes, reduce the federal debt and deficits, or even help fund a trillion dollar health care plan if one were so inclined to support such a plan.

So why is it that during these tough times, when we have great needs at home, the Obama White House is prepared to send more than two billion of your hard-earned tax dollars to Brazil so that the nation's state-owned oil company, Petrobras, can drill off shore and create jobs developing its own resources? That's all Americans want; but such rational energy development has been continually thwarted by rabid environmentalists, faceless bureaucrats and a seemingly endless parade of lawsuits aimed at shutting down new energy projects.

I'll speak for the talent I have personally witnessed on the oil fields in Alaska when I say no other country in the world has a stronger workforce than America, no other country in the world has better safety standards than America, and no other country in the world has stricter environmental standards than America. Come to Alaska to witness how oil and gas can be developed simultaneously with the preservation of our eco-system. America has the resources. We deserve the opportunity to develop our resources no less than the Brazilians. Millions of Americans know it is true: "Drill, baby, drill." Alaska is proof you can drill and develop, and preserve nature, with its magnificent caribou herds passing by the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS), completely unaffected. One has to wonder if Obama is playing politics and perhaps refusing a "win" for some states just to play to the left with our money.

The new Gulf of Mexico lease sales tomorrow sound promising and perhaps will move some states in the right direction, but we all know that the extreme environmentalists who serve to block progress elsewhere, including in Alaska, continue to block opportunities. These environmentalists are putting our nation in peril and forcing us to rely on unstable and hostile foreign countries. Mr. Obama can stop the extreme tactics and exert proper government authority to encourage resource development and create jobs and health benefits in the U.S.; instead, he chooses to use American dollars in Brazil that will help to pay the salaries and benefits for Brazilians to drill for resources when the need and desire is great in America.

Buy American is a wonderful slogan, but you can't say in one breath that you want to strengthen our economy and stimulate it, and then in another ship our much-needed dollars to a nation desperate to drill while depriving us of the same opportunity.

- Sarah Palin


There are two things I see here, plain and simple:

1) Sarah Palin knows a whole lot more about gas and oil production than our current administration, and how vital it is to our economy, and...

2) Sarah Palin certainly has a better grasp on economics, especially global economics, than our current community-organizing president.

Look to the building of the Transalaska Pipeline in the 1970's. Thousands of jobs were created and it lead to an economic boom in Alaska. Oil continues to flow from that pipeline and continues to provide oil to the United States today. Why can we not move forward and expand oil and gas production, tapping into as yet untapped resources in Alaska and other parts of the United States?

Alaska and other parts of the country have the resources we need. It boggles the mind why we would continue to purchase our energy resources from countries that don't even like us. Even more mind boggling is why, when our economy is in the worst shape it has been in decades, we would support oil production in Brazil (which leads to jobs for them and money for them) over our own resources and our own country?

Is this what the president meant by "shovel ready?" Maybe - Problem is, it's another country's shovel.


Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Alaskan Daily Digest - Moose tales

Well, once again I thought I would talk about moose. Not about their poop this time, just about them. We seem to live in moose central here in Wasilla. They are everywhere. We live about 5 miles outside town and our property is very wooded. We have horse farms on both sides of us, and the local moose have carved a trail between our properties. I can always tell when they're close by because our neighbor's horse gets antsy and starts making noise. Sometimes, however, they sneak up like they did when they destroyed my garden as you can see in my previous post "Gardening, Alaska style" (yes, I have moose issues).

So for today's Alaskan daily digest I thought I would share the story of Buzzwinkle the moose from the Anchorage Daily News. Buzzwinkle was a moose who had lived for years in downtown Anchorage and was known by the locals, especially the business owners. One day, Buzzwinkle ate some rotted fruit from a crabapple tree and got, well, drunk. It was close to the holiday season and Buzzwinkle proceeded to become entangled in some Christmas lights, staggering drunk through town with lights trailing behind him. Here are a couple of photos:


Buzzwinkle, tangled in lights


Buzzwinkle, staggering drunk through the streets downtown, with his decidedly "flashy" new look

And, here is my fairly useless factoid for the day from the Alaskan Almanac:

In Fairbanks, it is illegal for a moose to walk on the sidewalk. A pre-World War I ordinance was created because of a local bar owner who liked to get his pet moose drunk. The moose then stumbled around town, annoying the residents. So, if it is illegal for a moose to walk on the sidewalk, the animal could not get into a bar to drink.



Bookmark and Share

Do you really want the federal government telling you how to be a parent?

Ok, enough is enough. Each day this proposed bill gets more and more special. It hit a nerve when it was first revealed that the current administration's idea of reforming health care meant a government run system. It then hit a bigger nerve when it was revealed there were provisions that addressed end of life issues and the special needs members of our society as possibly not "productive" enough (please see my previous article "Learning about health care from experience"). And even now, the president is going around trying to get the support of veterans who have expressed concern their benefits may diminish. They already have eroded from what they were originally. But now, they want to tell me how to raise my kids. Ok, enough is enough.

Parenting is hard work. To me, there is no greater thing in life you can do than to raise good, decent human beings. This is the role of a mother and father. Look at the words "United States of America." What does that really mean? To me as a conservative, that means there are many states united under one flag. Each of those states is unique in it's own way, and conservatives believe that federal control should be limited and states should be allowed to govern (with as little intervention as possible) in a way that meets their needs. The needs of an agriculture state are different from the needs of a seaside fishing state than are different from a state like Alaska, rich in natural resources. Our United States of America is much like parenting: Each family has it's own unique set of goals, challenges, and needs. Each family should be allowed, and should be left alone, to choose what is best for their children.

I got rid of the "cookie cutter" notion in raising my children years ago. I was public school educated, but hated it. I never felt like I fit in, I desperately tried to, and now I wonder why because we are all unique and no one should try to mold themselves into something they're not. When my kids were little, I enrolled them in public school. I had one gifted child and two special needs ones. The cookie cutter mold just did not fit. We started homeschooling and the more we did it, the more it's ideals spilled over into other parts of my life. Homeschooling is based on the very foundation of understanding that a parent knows what is best for their child. You are your child's first teacher, after all. Who helps them learn to walk, eat, and form words? Who teaches by example, sets rules and watches over them? I had three kids with three unique learning styles and I was able to custom fit programs to each of them. I have never regretted this and feel blessed to live in a country that allows me to do this.

In an article written by Michael Farris, he points out that certain language in the health care bill could take away our right to parent our children the way we see fit. I do not want anyone telling me how to parent my children any more than I want them telling me which doctor to see or telling my granny she is no longer a productive member of society. This whole bill stinks. It reaks of government intrusion and is the very representation of what our founding fathers struggled against in founding this country. If this is progress, I don't want it. If this is change, I don't need it. Here is the article I mentioned. The entire article is posted below, but please click on the title and check out all the links, including the one about Mike Farris and his foundation.

Home invasions would occur under Obamacare

A parental-rights advocate is concerned that parental authority could be usurped under Obama's healthcare plan.

Mike Farris with ParentalRights.org is drawing attention to Title IX, Subpart 3, section 440, on page 837 of Obama's healthcare plan (HR 3200). That section deals with the creation of a government bureaucracy that would establish and expand "programs providing voluntary home visitation for families with young children and families expecting children."

Under the provision, the government would instruct parents on age-appropriate child development in "cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor skills." It would also provide parents with "modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices."

"The government simply has no business, no expertise, and no constitutional authority to come in and teach subjective values to families. They are so far out of their bailiwick," he suggests. "This is one of the most serious intrusions into families."

If the bill passes, states would compete for grants from the federal government to fund the program. Farris says this means the control is actually coming from the federal government, although it is set up to look like a state-run program. He concludes that it basically amounts to the federal government coming into a person's home and telling a parent how to raise his or her children.


Now is the time, parents and families, to stand up. This bill is wrong. It cannot pass, nor should anything like it.



Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Fishy emails

Did you know that Stuart Shepard received a "fishy" email from none other than - Barack Obama himself! Check it out!




Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Alaska Daily Digest - The Transalaska pipeline

I was in the middle of my daily digest last night when we lost our internet, so my apologies! I'm enjoying educating everyone about Alaska. I will continue writing these as long as there is interest, and as long as I have material! Some digests may be longer than others, depending on time and topic.

Construction of the Trans-Alaska pipeline began in 1977 during the gas shortages of the 70's. To this day, the pipeline continues to bring crude oil to the United States. Alaska is a natural resource-rich state, with resources such as oil, fish, gold and other minerals. It is undoubtedly the best purchase the United States ever made.

Much of this was taken from “Alaska Almanac: Facts About Alaska”

How does a barrel of oil travel along the 800-mile trans-Alaska oil pipeline?

"Oil from the Prudhoe Bay fields is 145F to 180F when it is pumped to the surface of the North Slope. The oil is cooled to about120F before it enters the pipeline.

The pipeline is 48 inches in diameter; much of it is raised above the permafrost but at 21 spots it dives underground. Oil takes five to six days to travel the 800 miles from Prudhoe Bay to the terminal at the ice-free port of Valdez. Ten pump stations hustle the oil along. Along the way, it crosses 834 rivers and streams, three major mountain ranges and an earthquake fault line. Caribou and other wildlife wander under raised parts of the pipeline. At Valdez, the cruse id loaded onto oceangoing oil tankers."


I was really excited to see the pipeline for the first time, snaking it's way through the Copper River Valley near Copper Center and Glennallen, and then again near Paxson. Here are some photos!







Bookmark and Share

Tea Party Video

I got goosebumps when I watched this video. I received the following email from a friend and attached was one of the best and most powerful videos I’ve ever seen. It represents what our country was founded on and how patriots feel about it. You can visit the Republican Women of Trussville website to see information on the group that put this together. Please, share this with everyone you know.

This resulted from a Mom in Alabama asking her high school son (Justin Holcomb) to help with a commercial for the Tea Party she was involved in organizing. Here is her note:

“I asked Justin if he could help me make a commercial for my group’s Tea Party. He sat down at the laptop for about an hour, and then brought this to me and asked, ‘is this okay, Mom?’

After I finished watching it, my stomach was in my throat.

Everyone that I have sent it to has really enjoyed it, so I wanted my friends to see it. I am so proud!”

There are some who say our kids don't understand what is important. I say it's only if their parents didn't teach them. Our job as parents is to teach our kids to be independent, to know right from wrong, and to stand up for what they believe in.

This mom did her job.



video

Friday, August 14, 2009

Newt's Advice for Sarah Palin

I love Newt Gingrich, more now than I did when he entered the political scene 20+ years ago. But hey, I was more liberal then so I was seeing him through different eyes. I heard his daughter Jackie Gingrich Cushman on Eddie Burke's talk radio show today. She was promoting a new book co-authored by her father titled, "Five Principles for a Successful Life." Newt is a successful author and his experiences no doubt have carried him well through life, so I was curious today when I saw an article on Politico's website. Newt Gingrich is offering Sarah Palin "comeback" advice.

I know what he means by "comeback," but I know many of you will agree that if Sarah is down and out now, I'd like to see her when she really "comes back." As Tammy Bruce said, all she does is "type, type, type," hits send, and the end-of-life provisions are dropped from the health care bill. What power.

What Newt is referring to in his article is Sarah's strategy to position herself as a candidate, presumably for a high profile office like the presidency. Two things come to mind with this: First, she seems to be doing pretty well as a citizen. She may not want to run. My second point is a little more complex.

If Sarah were to run for office again, no doubt much of the advice Newt gives would be vital. Sarah, however, is not bound by the playbook and I have no doubt she will do things differently. It is her style and has served her well to date. Things like writing a book and certain speeches sound good, and she is no stranger to hard work. Moving into a condo apartment - hmmm, that is more interesting. I just can't see it. It would be convenient, but I don't believe she would spend a great deal of time there. I could be wrong, but she loves Alaska so much, the two are almost inseparable,. If she is to jump to the national stage, this may be a necessity, however.

It will be interesting to see if she runs for office again. It will also be interesting to see how much of this she adopts. What do you think?


"Newt's Advice for Palin Comback"


Bookmark and Share

Alaskan Daily Digest - Familiy matters

Growing up in Ohio, I had heard stories of "famous" family members. There seemed to be more of the infamous variety, but I was intrigued when I found out there was a glacier by the name of Mendenhall in Alaska, which was my maiden name. This is not a common name and knew somehow we had to be related to its namesake, but it wasn't until just a couple of years ago that I was able to verify the family connection.

There were two famous Mendenhall men who had ties to Alaska. The first was Thomas Corwin Mendenhall. He was, among other things, the superintendent of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, and it was in this official capacity that he was responsible for defining the exact national boundary between the United States (Alaska) and Canada. In 1899, the largest glacier in Juneau was renamed Mendenhall Glacier in his honor by then President Harrison. It's original name was Auke Glacier and it was given that name by John Muir who had also explored the area. Here is a picture of the most famous glacier in southeast Alaska:



Another famous Mendenhall was Walter Curan Mendenhall. He was, also among other things, Director of the USGS appointed by President Hoover. He was an explorer and photographer who documented and mapped many areas of Alaska, and other parts of the country. The USGS has a great library of his photos online. The one I have chosen below is of Matanuska Glacier. This glacier is in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough of Alaska, very near to where I live. This glacier is beautiful and one of the easiest glaciers to access. You can literally drive up to it, get out, and take a walk. I love this glacier because of it's beauty and it's connection to my family's past: Walter Mendenhall actually gave Matanuska Glacier it's name. Often my husband and I have driven by the very point where this old photo was taken and I've wondered what it was like to be Walter, hiking and exploring the area 100+ years ago. How thrilling.



Below is a photo of how Matanuska Glacier looks today. This picture is of the glacier's terminus, or end. The older photo above is taken from a vantage point looking up into the mountain valley where the glacier originates.





Above is me on my first trip to Matanuska Glacier, with video below - isn't it beautiful?

video

Fun Fact: Glacier ice often appears blue to the eye because it absorbs all the colors of the spectrum except blue, which is scattered back.


Bookmark and Share

Granny update

Since I've introduced you to my granny, I thought I would post about her again today. My mother went to visit her last night. My parents divorced nearly 20 years ago, and granny is my mother's ex-mother-in-law, but everyone loves granny and mom tries to visit her when she can. This is a post from my mother's Facebook last night:

"Visited with Granny M. this evening. An aide was helping her to get up and she said to him, 'You have to get to be 90 years old for a young man to put his arms around you.' Really made me smile. She just keeps on keepin' on. Can't get over her positive attitude! God bless and keep her."


I pray I have that attitude when I'm 90!


Bookmark and Share

Cartoon time



Yes, that's how I envisioned it!


Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 13, 2009

The start of a new daily digest


I thought I would start a regular daily digest and fun facts about Alaska. To get started, I will give you some statistics and facts from our state

Misclleneous facts about Alaska

Motto: “North to the Future”
Nickname: “The Last Frontier”
State Capital: Juneau
Purchased from Russia: 1867
Organized as a territory: 1912
Entered the Union: Jan. 3, 1959, as 49th state
Governor: Sean Parnell
Land area: 570,373.6 square miles, or about 365,000,000 acres, according to revised figures from the U.S. Bureau of the Census in 1996. The largest state in the country, Alaska is one-fifth the size of the combined Lower 48 states.
Largest City in population:Anchorage, home to an estimated 279,249 people according to 2008 data, which is 40% of the state’s population
Largest city in area: Sitka, with 4,710 squares miles, 1,816 square miles of which is water. Juneau is second, with an area of 3,108 squares miles
Area per peson: About 0.92 square mile for each person in Alaska. New York State has 0.003 square miles per person.
Highest/lowest temperatures: Highest 100F at fort Yukon, 1915. Lowest -80F at Prospect Creek Camp 1971.
Heaviest annual snowfall: 974.5 inches at Thompson Pass near Valdez, during the winter of 1952-53
Tallest mountain in North America: Mount McKinley, known as Denali to Alaskans, at 20,320 feet
America’s biggest earthquake: Occurred on March 27, 1964 (Good Friday). Measured at 9.2 on the Richter scale – the strongest ever recorded in North America – and devastated much of Southcentral Alaska.
Greatest concentration of glaciers in the nation: About 29,000 square miles is covered by glaciers

Fun Fact: Snowmachiners breaking trail for the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race discovered that if they wired a can of SPAM on their exhaust manifold, they had a perfect hot meal in 50 miles! (Courtesy of Mr. Whitekeys)

Much of this was taken from “Alaska Almanac: Facts About Alaska”


Bookmark and Share

Alaska and Me



I found this on You Tube. Enjoy


Bookmark and Share

End of life decisions

The article below is not about health reform, but there are some very valid points that can be made about why some of the provisions in the reform bills are so wrong. The two areas I would like to address are disabled children and end of life.

It has been pointed out that there are very few disorders detected in utero that can actually be treated or resolved. We then must ask, why do we do prenatal testing? Prenatal testing can be very important in a handful of cases but many times, it is recommended, especially for older mothers, to expose the disabled child in utero. What are we encouraged to do with this knowledge? Often times, we are encouraged to abort.

Ironically, my OB/GYN encouraged me to have prenatal testing done when I was pregnant with my youngest, who would later be diagnosed with a bone disease. I opted not to have the testing. My doctor asked why, so I asked him, "What is the main thing you are looking for?" When he stated Down Syndrome, I then asked, "If my baby is found to have Down Syndrome, is there anything you can do about it?" He quietly answered, "no." To this, I replied "Then there is no need for the testing." Today there still is no routine screening that can detect my son's bone disease and the other disorders he has, and it has been 18 years since his birth. The only thing I, and many others, can conclude is that these tests are given in order to encourage the parents to abort.

To their credit, there are families who are faced with this information and the abortion decision, and they have chosen not to abort. What choices are there for those who find their child will not survive? That is what this article is about. It is called prenatal hospice.

A GRIEF CONSERVED: Perinatal hospice offers an alternative to the trauma of aborting a disabled child | Matt Anderson

"Something's wrong with this baby," my ultrasound technician told me. She had just scanned Mrs. Jones (a fictitious name) at 20 weeks and went on to describe her findings, findings that surely meant little chance of survival for that baby. As I later spoke with Mrs. Jones to relay the findings, she wept. I arranged an appointment with a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist.

The next day I received an urgent call from my patient. Through more tears, she described her visit in which the MFM doctor confirmed the grim prognosis. The baby would die, probably within a week or two. The MFM insisted on scheduling her for an abortion in three days. "Do I have to have an abortion?" she asked. I promised to call the MFM and assured her she did not have to abort.

When I called the MFM specialist, she immediately rattled off the severe abnormalities found, the fetus' incompatibility with life, and the scheduling of an abortion. I interrupted: "If the baby is going to die anyway, why do you want to kill it before it dies a natural death?" There was silence on the other end. I went on to explain that the parents would not have to deal with the guilt of killing their child if it died naturally. There was a pause, then, "I hadn't thought of that," she said.

So much for nondirective counseling, as it is called. Sadly, I've had several similar experiences in my 27 years of practice.


My patient's baby did die in utero about two weeks later. She labored and delivered a stillborn baby with all the grief and pain associated with it. She was thankful, however, for the love and support of family and friends during the process and the knowledge that she had not contributed to her baby's death.

When a pregnant woman clearly understands the primary purpose of genetic testing—abortion of a handicapped baby—a majority decline testing in my experience and almost all pro-life women decline testing. Nearly every problem now identified by prenatal diagnosis has no treatment. David Grimes, a well-known OB/GYN, professor at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, and a strong abortion advocate, spoke truth in a rare moment of public clarity when he said prenatal diagnosis would disappear if abortion were not available.

But what happens when a routine 20-week ultrasound shows a baby with a profound abnormality, possibly an abnormality that will certainly result in the death of the baby prior to or shortly after birth? Or when a genetic test is done and shows similar results and the patient then decides against abortion? What then?

Enter perinatal hospice, the brain child of Byron Calhoun, a pro-life maternal-fetal medicine specialist.

Perinatal hospice honors life. The woman carrying the disabled child receives extensive counseling and birth preparation involving the combined efforts of MFM specialists, OB/GYN doctors, neonatologists, anesthesia services, chaplains, pastors, social workers, labor and delivery nurses, and neonatal nurses. She carries the pregnancy to its natural conclusion. She and her husband are allowed to grieve and prepare for the short time God may grant them with their child while their baby lives inside or outside the womb. Such a process obviates the grief caused by elective abortion, killing the child before it could be born.

Doctors and nurses often withdraw from hopeless patients, and surely a baby with a lethal anomaly is a hopeless patient. Add to that, as my example above illustrates, the concept of natural death for babies with lethal anomalies perplexes those who advocate abortion and prenatal eugenics. For them, not terminating a hopeless pregnancy is stupid.

Perinatal hospice, on the other hand, allows natural grief and separation with the support of the medical community. Calhoun says parental responses have been overwhelmingly positive. "These parents are allowed the bittersweetness of their child's birth and too-soon departure. Grief lessens as time passes and the parents rest secure in the knowledge that they shared in their baby's life and treated the child with the same dignity as a terminally-ill adult."

Even those mystified by a patient choosing life have recognized the value of Calhoun's idea, as perinatal hospice programs now dot the nation. But this mystery is no mystery to us. As Job 1:21 states, "Naked I came from my mother's womb, and naked shall I return. The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."

—Matt Anderson is a practicing OB/GYN in Minnesota and blogs regularly at mdviews.wordpress.com


Two things jumped out at me when I read this article:
1) The author, a physician, explains the conversation he had with another "professional" (a maternal-fetal medicine specialist) who recommended abortion to the family of a child who die in utero. The specialist never even considered that the family might feel they had participated in their child's death if they chose abortion.
2) The author admits that he has had several similar experiences in his 27 years of practice.

What will happen if we include provisions regarding these very personal counseling sessions in health care legislation? Are all counselors going to take into account the needs and wants of the family? This article shows how we can get this right, but also how we can get this wrong. These types of discussions do not belong in government legislation and certainly should not be funded by our government. This is between a doctor, a patient, a family, and God.

Here is a link to the original article:
A grief conserved


Bookmark and Share

My granny, a productive member of society

In my post "Learning about health care from experience" I talked about my 90-year-old grandmother who just had a rod put in her leg because of a bone defect caused by cancer. I saw a post recently on my aunt's Facebook page and had to share it with you. My aunt and her brothers and sisters have spent a great deal of time at the hospital helping my grandmother. My grandmother is an amazing woman!

"Mom took her first steps today and we were clappin' and tellin' her what a good job she did and so she ask Sheryl what all the fuss was about and she said"You walked" to which mom replied "Hell I could walk when I came in her...e". Sometimes she just doesn't realize how remarkable she is."


There was a book written a few years ago titled "...And Ladies of the Club." It was written by Helen Hooven Santmyer who was another amazing woman who wrote about the town of Xenia, Ohio, which is where I am from. My grandmother knew Helen, as well as many of the characters in her book. My grandmother herself has kept journals for years and years, and they have fascinating stories and insights I hope our family can one day share with everyone. She is, and will forever be, a productive member of society.

Here is a picture of my granny wearing a bluetooth headset. She is such a hoot!




Bookmark and Share

Sarah Palin Is Not Wrong

Here is a link to a blog post concerning Sarah Palin's comments on "death panels."

Palin Is Not Wrong by Greg Scandlin

I agree with Mr. Scandlin, wholeheartedly.


Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

A British perspective

My dear friend Jill commented on my post "Learning about health care from experience" and with her permission, I'd like to share her comments with you. Jill is a cancer survivor and a very special friend. She is originally from England, married a US Army man who just retired, and Jill recently became a naturalized citizen. As someone who still has many family members in England, she is very familiar with government run health care. She has some very strong feelings on the matter, ones our current administration would do well to heed and adopt. I'm glad that Jill received the care she needed from our Tricare military medical system. I just pray we all are not forced into the National Health Service system England has. Here are her comments:

Tracey,
as you know, I have gone through breast cancer twice, and been incredibly blessed to have Tricare pay for basically the whole amount of treatment (including back to back stem cell rescues costing over $100,000). Until last year I was a British citizen. I KNOW there is no way that I would have received the same level of care under the NHS (National Health Service). My sister and brother in law live in the UK. They have had to wait literally months for operations, and then be told, the day before the surgery was scheduled "I'm sorry, we need to reschedule your surgery as we don't have a bed available for you." That is incredibly frustrating. My brother in law heads up a lab and had arranged for everything to be taken care of while he would be gone for 3 months, including reorganizing staff. The NHS prounouncement meant that he had to reorganize everything again...this time for three months later when they finally did have a bed for him. In the US there are medical protocols that they suggest for close family members of breast cancer patients. In the UK there are no such protocols. My sister may well contract breast cancer because ther are just not the same levels of checks and balances available to her. Many people in the UK pay for very expensive private insurance because they are just not willing to wait 12 months or more for a hip replacement surgery for example. President BO can say all day long that this is not about end of life issues, but I know differently. Even today, the elderly (those over 65!!) are being denied breast cancer medication because it is "too costly". It will happen here too if the government is allowed to regulate who does and who does not get treatment. It is wrong.


Well said Jill.


Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Learning about health care from experience

I have wanted to write in depth about my feelings and thoughts on health care reform, but day-to-day life has kept me from it. So, as I sit on the couch, home from work because I am sick, I thought it was an appropriate time to discuss this issue. I have had plenty of “brushes” with government health care already so I feel I have a lot to say on this topic.

When my oldest daughter was 4 years old she got sick. My husband was active duty Navy and we relied on the Navy medical care system to provide our health care. I am grateful we had free health care because I feel that so much is owed to our military and it makes me sick to see those benefits eroding, especially for veterans. I was not, however, crazy about the military medical system at the time. This was pre-Tricare, which is better than what we had 20+ years ago, but still has many issues. It was totally run by the military/government and there was no private outsourcing or the options you see today.

This is how it worked: You got sick and needed to see a doctor. You were given a phone number to call, the same number given to everyone. Often this phone number was busy. You could literally call ALL DAY, or set your phone to do automatic redialing of the number all day, and never get through. If you or your child were sick enough, you would end up in the military hospital ER, often waiting 6+ hours just to see a doctor. So, when my daughter became ill, I began calling the number, trying to get her in to see someone. The first day, I could not get through. She was not sick enough to warrant an ER visit, so I started calling again the next morning. That afternoon, I was able to get through and was able to get her in to see someone the next evening. Now, if you’re keeping track, we are already on day 3 of her illness before even getting to see someone.

Based on my daughter’s symptoms of fever and vomiting, I was told to give her Tylenol and put her on the BRAT (bananas, rice, applesauce, toast) diet to calm her stomach. I left with my complimentary bottle of free children’s Tylenol and got home late that evening. Violently ill throughout the night, I started calling again the next morning and got an appointment for her that afternoon. I took her back in (day 4), was told that I had not given it enough time to resolve, and promptly sent home with another bottle of free Tylenol.

I was a young mother and trusted these doctors, but knew something was seriously wrong with my child. When she was lethargic the next day (day 5), again I called. This time I got a nurse who had pulled my daughter’s chart and refused to even give me an appointment because the nurse thought I was being too reactionary and I was told to stick to the Tylenol and BRAT diet. I wasn’t even allowed to bring her in. Desperate to help my child, I called a nurses line for the local children’s hospital. Because we were part of the military medical system, we were not authorized to use private providers. I told this nurse I didn’t care how much it was going to cost – I would figure out a way to pay for it out of pocket. I just needed someone to see my child. She agreed to make an appointment for me later that day with a private pediatrician.

When I took my daughter to see this doctor, he took one look at her, got on the phone, and arranged to have her admitted to the children’s hospital immediately. She was very sick and eventually diagnosed with Henoch-Schonlein purpura, a blood disorder that can lead to renal failure and can be fatal. She spent the next several days in the hospital and after many tests and a long recovery period, she was back to normal. Had I listened to that nurse on the military medical line, my child could have died. I do not blame the person – I blame the process. I had the option to go to a private physician only because I was not restricted to a single payer system, and because I was willing to pay. If we adopt a single payer system, we will have no options. To me, that is frightening and unacceptable.

My youngest son has the bone disease hypophosphatasia which is very rare. He is one of my special needs kids I talk about. I have another son, whose picture is in a previous post, who has Asperger's syndrome, a high functioning form of autism. I have networked with many families whose children, and other family members, have this same bone disease. Two stories come to mind when I think of health care reform. One is of a woman in Canada. She has health care through the government there. The first time I ever spoke to her was when she was seeking options for treatment. She was in pain and wheelchair bound. She explained how she waited months to see an orthopedist and even more months for surgery. I seriously thought she was exaggerating. How could a government system do this? It wasn’t until I became a contact for a support group that I heard more stories that were similar. One was from a mom in England whose son was born with the same bone disease. He had serious ribcage deformities and yet the doctors there denied the treatment he needed. She never got a clear answer, but she believed it was because of their rationed health care system. She flew at her own expense to the United States to see a specialist in Missouri so that her son could get the proper treatment that England could not, or would not, provide. Is this what we want in the United States?

As you may be aware from reading my blog, I recently visited family in Ohio. My father’s mother, who is 90, had been diagnosed with cancer just before I came to visit so I made sure I saw her while I was there. This woman is remarkable. Very savvy and sharp as a tack, she has had many surgeries. Each time in recent years she has had a surgery, I have wondered how much more this woman can deal with and still go on. And yet, she seems unphased by it all and comes out shining. She has had a graft in her carotid artery, quadruple bypass surgery, vascular stenting, and recently had hip replacement surgery. When she was initially diagnosed with lung cancer, many tests were run and it was found it had spread to her bones. She had developed a defect in her femur (thigh bone) that was causing a great deal of pain and keeping her from walking. She was told she only had a few months to live and would be bedridden. Not happy with this, she started asking questions and asking them how to fix it. The doctors said if she were younger or healthier, they would put a metal rod in her femur, but they weren’t sure how she would handle that kind of surgery now. She opted to take the risk and the family agreed to grant her wishes and advised the doctors to proceed. The doctors took wonderful care of her and just 5 days ago, she had the surgery. She is now up and around! What a woman.

Do you think the government would have even given her the option of that surgery under a single payer system? Would she have been considered a “productive” member of society? She is a productive member to me, and to my family. She has children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren who love her very much. She has a great quality of life because she had the choice to live just a few months longer and be able to walk while she’s doing it. WHO other than the patient and their family should have the right to decide this? No one as far as I’m concerned.

I am as certain about this as I have ever been about anything – the system they are proposing now is not the answer. Our current health care system is not perfect by a long shot, but a single payer, government run health care system is not the answer. Do you really want the same guys who run the post office (think long lines), who erased the original footage of the moon walk (one of the greatest photographic moments), and whose current Medicare system is fraught with abuse and deeply in debt, running the system that could possibly save your life or your family member’s life? After reading this, please, please take the time to follow this link: “An Inconvenient Truth About The “Death Panel.” The future of our lives depends on it.


Bookmark and Share

Monday, August 10, 2009

From the horse's mouth

In this video, Jane explains to President Obama that her then 99-year-old mother (now 105) received a pacemaker after the doctor realized her quality of life would be improved, despite her age. When Jane asked Obama if she would have received the same pacemaker under his new plan,, he said “ Well now that's a tough one ... that costs a lot and maybe we will have to say, just take a pill.”



Did he actually just say that? I certainly hope this puts to an end any question where Obama stands on the issue of who a “productive” member of society is.


Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 9, 2009

A Town Hall Message to Alaskans

Alaska's junior Senator Mark Begich calls himself a moderate "blue dog" Democrat but he voted for the $3 trillion "stimulus" bill, and last week he voted to confirm an anti-second amendment rights judge to a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.

The next big test for Begich will be when he votes on President Obama's health care legislation. So far, all that is known about his ideas on this are on a 51-minute YouTube audio from his July 27 telephone townhall meeting. It's kind of hard to follow, and doesn't really address the concerns many Alaskans have about the staggering expansion of government control as well as the reckless spending that will bankrupt our nation. But, Alaskans are good at holding their politicians accountable, and Sen. Begich should remember that before he votes. Alaskans should ask serious questions tomorrow when Senator Begich talks about health care reform at the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce.

Here's a direct quote from him from his July 27 i-TownHall on health care:

"If you got a doctor now, you got a medical professional that you want, you get to keep that. If you have an insurance program or health care policy you want of ideas, make sure you keep it-that you can keep who you want. That we keep that patient/doctor relationship very strong. Pre-existing conditions is a principle that must be in all health care reform. That no matter what pre-existing condition you have that you can be covered, and that you can have portability between employer to employer. Also strengthening our veterans as well as our Indian Health Services are also important. And the two other last pieces I'll mention is ensuring that prevention and wellness is a critical piece, and that the small business community also has the opportunity to receive access to affordable health care for not only their - themselves as entrepreneurs, but also their employees. It is clear by a data report we laid out recently that if we don't do this, especially around the business - the small business community, it is estimated over the next decade by doing nothing will be about a hundred billion cost to the small business community, which means we all pay for it one way or another."


All Alaskans who are concerned about health care reform and the staggering expansion of government control need to attend these town hall meetings.

- Monday August 10 Sen. Begich will be at the Dena'ina Center from 11:00 to 1:00
- Thursday August 13 Sen. Murkowski will be at the Pioneer Park Theater from 4:00 to 6:00 pm
- Thursday August 20 Sen. Murkowski will be in Anchorage, location to be announced
- Friday August 28 Sen. Murkowski will be in Wasilla, location to be announced
- Saturday August 29 Sen. Murkowski will be in Soldotna, location to be announced

And below is a message from Sarah Palin, another message concerning townhall meetings:

Tomorrow begins an important week for Alaskans.

On Monday, state lawmakers will meet to override my veto of stimulus funds. As Governor, I did my utmost to warn our legislators that accepting stimulus funds will further tie Alaska to the federal government and chip away at Alaska’s right to chart its own course. Enforcing the federal building code requirements, which Governor Parnell and future governors will be forced to adopt in order to accept these energy funds, will eventually cost the state more than it receives. There are clear ropes attached, and Alaskans will soon find themselves tied down by codes which will dictate how we build and renovate homes and businesses. The state has hundreds of millions of dollars already budgeted for conservation, weatherization and renewable energy development. Legislators don’t need to play politics as usual and accept these funds and the ropes that come with them.

Also this week, Alaskans will join Senators Murkowski and Begich in town hall meetings to discuss the current health care legislation. There are many disturbing details in the current bill that Washington is trying to rush through Congress, but we must stick to a discussion of the issues and not get sidetracked by tactics that can be accused of leading to intimidation or harassment. Such tactics diminish our nation’s civil discourse which we need now more than ever because the fine print in this outrageous health care proposal must be understood clearly and not get lost in conscientious voters’ passion to want to make elected officials hear what we are saying. Let’s not give the proponents of nationalized health care any reason to criticize us.

- Sarah Palin


Bookmark and Share

Friends with a sense of humor

I love my friends, especially my conservative friends. It's like a book I read recently by Marie Osmond titled "Might As Well Laugh About It Now." Well, in order to provide some more levity, I thought I would pass this on from a friend, with permission. I am using only her first name, but she gives her full name in the actual letter to none other than Barak Obama himself. She wrote this letter because of the TARP money she received but did not ask for. I am certain that many disabled veterans need this money and were glad to have it and I do not begrudge them for accepting it. Julie, however, neither asked for or wanted this assistance. This is about personal choice and being involved in decisions on where this money goes. This is a democracy after all. And for those of you not from Alaska, Sen. Lisa Murkowski is our Republican Senator.

August 9, 2009

TO: President Barak Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington DC

FROM: Julie

SUBJECT: TARP Money for Veterans

Dear President Obama,

I would like to personally thank you for the $250 check I received for no reason other than being a disabled veteran. I was surprised at first to receive this unexpected money. I pondered what to do with it for about 5 minutes. There was no question in my mind I should reinvest it in my government.

I plan to donate the entire amount to my Senator, Lisa Murkowski. She represents my beliefs and values. She represents the country that I served for 20 years in the Air Force. I’m hoping she and other like-minded representatives in Congress will restore our Republic. I will support all candidates new and incumbent that have this simple agenda.

Please feel free to continue sending me money that I might reinvest into the government that I will believe in again real soon. I still know my country is beautiful and these recent Town Hall meetings have restored my faith that there are many Americans that share my belief in our First Amendment and desire to uphold our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence.

Respectfully,


Julie
Senior Master Sergeant, USAF, Retired


P.S. I am one of those people that disagree with your healthcare plan (I know, big surprise), so please feel free to add me to your snitch list, or whatever you may be calling it.



I couldn't have said it better myself Julie.


Bookmark and Share

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Moose poop, anyone?

It seems that every time I get online these days, I get seriously frustrated over the country's current situation, so to lighten things up a bit I thought I would write about an annual event here in Alaska. Every year, thousands descend upon the tiny town of Talkeetna (say that three times fast)to watch the guys at the VFW drop a large bag of moose poop onto a target behind their lodge. Sound, like, fun? Well, IT IS! It's official name is the Talkeetna Moose Dropping Festival and no, they don't drop a moose - just their poop. Actually, it's no different than any other festival in the lower 48 that celebrates something unique about it's area and culture. I should know - I grew up in Ohio, and Ohio and it's folk are all about the festival. In Ohio, every town and village has it's own festival. There is the bean festival, the potato festival, the corn festival, the sauerkraut festival and so on. Here in Alaska, we celebrate poop. Yeah, Alaska.

Actually it's really a neat little get together. There is a lot of good food, lots of people, vendors, all surrounded by the quaint little town of Talkeetna, which is the "jumping off point" for those who are crazy enough/I mean brave enough to ascend Denali, the mountain you folk outside (of Alaska) know as Mt. McKinley. Talkeetna is very touristy in the summer and filled with hearty good folk in the winter.

It all works like this: A large wire cable is strung 20 or 30 feet above the ground behind the VFW. From this cable is a potato sack (or something like it) filled with moose droppings. Now, you have to understand something about moose poop. Moose poop is a lot like rabbit poop, only bigger. It comes out shaped like one of those little chocolate egg candies and about twice the size (not Cadbury egg size, more like malted milk ball size). Way too much information yet? Anyway, they shellac each of them and paint them white, then place a number on them. Before the actual dropping of the poop, they sell tickets with numbers corresponding the numbers on the poop. When dropped, prizes are given to those holding the numbers of the closest piece of poop to the target, the farthest poop to the target, etc. The television crews actually come out for this event.

Here are some photos from the festival and a video from the actual "dropping of the poop." A little Alaskana for those of you who need a break from the political climate right now.



Nagley's General Store in the center of Talkeetna



This dog is well known locally and quite the draw for camera-wielding tourists and the like. He rides on the back of his owner's 3-wheeled motorcycle



Mountain High Pizza Pie makes a good pie. It's owned by a guy originally from Pennsylvania near Pittsburgh. He's a huge Steelers fan and you can see all kinds of Steelers stuff in this place.



A bag 'o poop being hoisted high above the crowd



And, the release! Poop is flying everywhere as it is caught by a breeze



Now, the serious part. The measuring of distance by an official (guy in Carharts) with a camera crew at the ready! Just check out this video:

video


Bookmark and Share